1884

  A HISTORY OF FEATHERSTONE

 1884

THE INQUEST ON VIOLET FROBISHER
  An inquest was held at the Sun Inn in January on Violet Edith Frobisher age 14, a servant with the Ottleys at Headingley, Leeds. Grace Frobisher, a widow, had received a letter from her daughter saying she was ill. A few days later she was brought home by Miss Mary Ottley by rail and cab. She told Mrs Frobisher Violet's illness had begun with sickness and suggested this had been brought on by drinking six gallons of beer which had gone from a cask in the house.
  Dr Buncle attended Violet and recommended brandy and milk for the pains in her stomach. She died that night. Dr Buncle did a post mortem but was unable to determine the cause of death, although there was an obstruction in the upper bowel. The inquest was adjourned for Mrs and Miss Ottley to attend.
  When it resumed Mrs Jane Ottley said Violet had been in her employ for 11 weeks. She had been well until a few days before her death when she had vomited on the kitchen floor after being out to see her sister, also a servant in Leeds. She was dismissed for drinking the beer and was taken home. They walked to the station but she became worse on the journey so a cab was called at Featherstone Station.
  The coroner said the master of a servant was not obliged to provide medical treatment for her unless she asked for a doctor, and no doctor had attended her in Leeds. A very lamentable error of judgement had been committed in the girl being removed to Featherstone, but unless this had been taken against her wishes, or a doctor's orders, they were not criminally responsible.
  The jury decided death was caused by obstruction and congestion of the bowel, and it had been accelerated by her injudicious removal when in an unfit state.

 SHOTFIRING WITH GUNPOWDER
  In 1884 there were no safe explosives for use in coal mines and gunpowder was the one most frequently used. It produced a lot of flame and was very dangerous. Many ignitions of gas (firedamp or methane) were caused and the Government considered banning it, but the owners claimed it was necessary to provide the increasing quantity of coal required for Britain's growing industries.
  A compromise was reached allowing gunpowder to be used in a place where no gas had been found for three months and when only the shotfirer was in the pit.
  In February the Pontefract Advertiser reported: George Senior, manager of Featherstone Manor and Ackton Hall Collieries, was charged with allowing shotfiring when men were working in the mine and within three months of gas being found there. The prosecution was brought by the Home Office and Mr Gill of Wakefield represented it.
  He said the offence was one of very great and paramount importance, and the offence which was to be proved against the defendant was one of frequent occurrence, although the Home Office was quite determined to put a stop to it. It would be clearly and unmistakably shown there had been grievous mismanagement in the mine, which was the property of George Bradley of Ackton Hall. The defendant had been certificated manager not more than a year, and the practice complained of had been carried out before he came into his position, and he had evidently fallen into bad ways by bad example.
   Last December 16 and 17 shots were fired in the mine in direct, open and wanton violation of the law. Responsible persons known as underground viewers entered reports in books kept for the purpose, and in these books it would be found gas was reported in those very places where these shots were fired, although the Act distinctly provided that within three months after the discovery of the existence of gas no gunpowder or any inflammable substance whatever was to be used, neither was it to be used at all when men were working in the mine.
  When Mr Goddard, assistant inspector, visited the mine on December 17 there were about 100 men in various parts of the workings, and he found a very large accumulation of gas in another place. He then ascertained shots had been fired and saw four men almost within reach of the gas. Previously, prosecutions had been made against deputies and underlings generally, but now it was the intention of the Government to prosecute the owners, agents and managers. It was hoped the effect of the prosecution being brought so prominently before Mr Bradley and others would be salutary, and the law would in future be better regarded.
  The opinion of the Solicitor General was no shot whatever should be fired by day or night when men were in the mines, and this rule must be regarded and abided by if the lives of the men engaged in the precarious calling of coal getting were to be protected.
  Joseph Chamber, underground viewer, said it was his duty to examine the underground workings and to make a report in a book. On December 2 he found gas in "No.4 bank" and withdrew the workmen. It was the custom of the pit not to stop shotfiring if gas was found. The drills for boring were kept where all men had access to them. They provided their own powder and no permission had to be obtained for the firing of shots. Between December 2 and 17 about 8 or 10 shots a day were fired on average. He accompanied Mr Gerard on his visit and they found gas in No.4 bank. There was also the smell of powder from a shot fired 100 yards away. All the shots were fired by deputies.
  Charles Birchall, coal getter, said he worked in No.4 bank and confirmed a shot had been fired. Hiram Walshaw, shotfirer, said he fired five or six shots a day in No.4 bank. He had known of the discovery of gas but had not been told to discontinue firing. (The Advertiser commented all the witnesses appeared unwilling to give evidence against the manager.)
  Mr Gerard said he visited the mine on December 17. In one of the working places he found a large quantity of gas and perceived a distinct smell of gunpowder. He discovered a shot had been fired in a bank closely adjoining. He examined the report book and found an entry of the discovery of gas on December 2. Shots should be fired at night between shifts and nobody whatever should be in the mine except the shotfirer.
  Mr Kershaw, a Leeds barrister, defended Senior. He said he had no doubt the Act prohibited the firing of shots within three months of gas being found, but he contended the defendant was not liable to any penalty on the principle that no one can be made criminally responsible for the acts of his servants, unless connivance and guilty knowledge was proved. The defendant had done all he could by posting the rules and supplying all applicants with a copy. As no wilful or guilty knowledge had been proved Mr Kershaw asked the Bench to dismiss the charge against Senior.
  Mr Gill said it was not the intention of the Government to proceed against such persons as underviewers and the like, as heretofore, but against the owners and managers, who were now to be held responsible for the lives of the men placed in their hands as it were. The defendant had the supervision of the book in which a report of the existence of gas was entered, and although he must have known there was gas in the workings, he allowed the man appointed for that duty alone to fire shots several times daily; and now he pretended he had taken every possible precaution. Could the defendant defend such conduct as this? The prosecution asked that where as in this case a flagrant  breach had been committed, the Bench would inflict such a penalty as would prevent them and others from repeating such an offence in the future.
  The magistrates retired to consider their decision, and on their return the chairman said "We have decided the defendant is guilty. The offence with which he is charged is a very serious one, and he ought to have known better than to act as he has done. He might very easily have caused a great and terrible calamity. We have decided to inflict a fine of £10 and costs". (The maximum fine was £20.)

A  NEW WATER SUPPLY?
  A new development brought the water supply situation back into prominence when it was learned Wakefield Corporation had decided to build a reservoir in the hills to the west and pipe the water to Wakefield. Featherstone Local Board decided to ask if the supply could be extended to Featherstone. Mr Wardman said if they talked about the matter in 12 months time it would be soon enough.
  It was December before a reply was received from Wakefield saying it would be two years before the water works were completed.  Pontefract Corporation also informed the Local Board they were seeking a new source of water and might be able to supply Featherstone.

1884 NEWS ITEMS
JANUARY  George Bradley refused to sell the land the Yorkshire and Lancashire Railway Company required to make improvements to the north side of the station.

FEBRUARY  The Featherstone Local Board set a half-year rate of 6d in the £1. They agreed to make a road crossing of setts at Purston School and Streethouse. A tender of £18 9s was accepted for the two. (At this time the roads were made of dross and were very muddy in wet weather.)  There was also a rate of 1s 2d for the poor, Burial and School Boards.

  The Board of Guardians issued a summons against the Ackton overseers because they had not paid the call (the poor rates.)

MARCH  Charles Bennett was charged with assaulting Mary Ann Teasdale on what was know locally as the "Saturday night drunken train" from Tanshelf to Featherstone. There was a rush for the train at Tanshelf and Mary got into a carriage with Joseph Shaw, with whom she had been living "tally" until the previous week. She claimed those already in the carriage tried to turn her out, and in the ensuing struggle she was struck by Bennett and her head knocked against the window. Bennett claimed Shaw had offered to fight anyone in the carriage and Teasdale, who was very drunk, rolled up her sleeves and said she would fight him. He denied hitting her. PC Lee said the Saturday before he had been called by Mr Dawson, the station master, to get Mrs Teasdale's name as he intended reporting her. The case was dismissed.

  A five year old girl playing with matches set fire to an out-building containing straw and hay on the premises of J White a cab proprietor in Station Lane. Volunteers put out the blaze before it could reach benzolene and fireworks in the same building.

  The Local Board passed plans for Mr Maxwell's house and shop in Station Lane. They were informed by Mr Bradley he intended working the Winter and Stanley Main seams at Manor Colliery. This is probably when he changed the name to Ackton Hall and Manor Collieries.

   There was one change in the local Guardians for the next year. George Bradley (no appearances at meetings last year) continued for Ackton, Richard Cowling took over Featherstone from Ernest Andrew who had made nine appearances, and John Waller, who missed only three meetings out of 27, continued for Purston.

APRIL  Nine Featherstone men and women were fined for being drunk and disorderly. Mary O'Connell, said to be one of the worst characters in South Featherstone, refused to pay and was sent to prison for 14 days. Supt Whincup said he was making special efforts to prevent drunkenness on Sundays.

JUNE  Edward Martin was arrested in West Bromwich and brought to Pontefract to be charged with deserting his wife and children in Featherstone. They were compelled to apply to the Pontefract Union (the Board of Guardians) for relief and had been given a total of £10 9s. Martin claimed he had gone away after Dr Buncle said it would be good for his health. He was sent to prison for one month with hard labour.

  The Local Board agreed to recommend to the Local Government Board that voting in Board elections should be by ballot ie in secret. The current system was voting papers were sent out and had to be returned within a few days. Some of these were found to have been altered many times.

  Richard Wright was fined for the tenth time for letting his cattle stray on the highway. Supt Whincup said the defendant had no land of his own so he sent them out in the charge of a small boy, presumably to forage what they could.

JULY  One morning eight men went into the Railway Hotel and ordered rum and beer. When they left, empty porter bottles were found which were normally stored in the cellar. Three of the men were arrested and warrants were issued for the others. They were charged with stealing the porter while the bar was unattended, but the Bench decided there was not enough evidence to convict.

  The Local Board accepted a tender of £49 6s 5½d for the flagging of Green Lane, Pontefract Road and Whinney Lane. A tender of £34 was refused because it arrived after the deadline.

  At a Board of Guardians meeting the assistant clerk said he expected all the calls would be paid except for that at Ackton, and the overseers would have to be proceeded against as usual for non-payment.

AUGUST  The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company informed the Local Board they were still unable to buy the land to improve Featherstone Station. The Board was of the opinion the company already owned sufficient land to build a subway and provide better accommodation. Mr Denton said because the Featherstone people were only colliers the company thought anything would do for them.

  The 7th annual athletics meeting (Purston feast) was held in a field on Pontefract Road. The Pontefract Borough Band marched from the station to the field to give an afternoon concert.

  The Goole to Wakefield passenger train hit a heifer at 5.30pm belonging to Alfred Copley. The engine was not derailed and after a ten minutes delay it continued its journey.

  William Gittins, acting overseer for Ackton, was summonsed for not paying the call of  £234 12s 2d due to the Pontefract Union. The Bench ordered the payment of the money forthwith.

OCTOBER  The Local Board fixed a half-year rate of 10d. The magistrates signed for a rate of 1s 1d for the poor, Burial and School Boards.

NOVEMBER  John Kirkbride sued George Bradley for a week's wage of £1 7s and a fortnight's wages in lieu of notice. He was employed as enginewright at Ackton Hall Colliery and he had ordered a cast iron pipe to fit a boiler. Although he said he had ordered the correct length it arrived too short, and in attempting to make it fit it snapped. The manager, George Senior, was not on the premises so he could not report it immediately, and the next morning he was sacked.
  For Mr Bradley it was said Kirkbride had ordered the pipe a foot short, and because of other previous faults and errors he was dismissed for wilful neglect. The Bench decided the sacking was justified. Kirkbride would receive his week's wages but not pay in lieu of notice, and he would have to pay £1 damages to Mr Bradley for damage to the pipe.
  Mr Kirkbride was then fined £1 for not reporting a crack in a crank on the pumping machinery which kept the mine clear of water. If the pump had broken down hundreds of pound of damage would have been caused by water flooding into the mine.

  A complaint was made to the Local Board that George Bradley had enclosed a public well at North Featherstone. The Board told the surveyor to make inquiries and he reported the old residents said the well had been used by the public for at least 80 years. It was what was originally the parish pinfold, and Mr Bradley had erected a wall round it but he had left a doorway in it and the public were not prevented from getting water.

DECEMBER  William Gittins had not paid the money owed to the Pontefract Union and a warrant was issued for his arrest but he could not be found in Ackton.

  The Local Board chairman, Joseph Fearnley, complained about the bad smell of gas in church on Sundays. Mr Cowling said it was because all the lamps were fed by a common meter and gas was allowed to escape until all the lamps were lit.
  The clerk reported George Bradley had enclosed the North Featherstone well in 1880, and the water was now polluted by sewage matter from nearby cottages and this would have to be remedied by the owners. Mr Bradley could be ordered to remove the wall and rebuild the pinfold. It was unanimously agreed he be requested to do this, and Mr Bradley was given three months notice.

  Henry Slater, William Luckman and Jeremiah Bradley were playing cards for money in Slater's house. Bradley was accused of not playing fair and was assaulted by the other two. In court they were fined £1 each plus costs.

  There was a letter in the Yorkshire Post from a man who simply signed as Rufus saying he missed the 1.30pm train to Wakefield on a Saturday afternoon and had to wait until 3.45 for the next one. He said it was wage day for the miners, and their wives had to wait until they returned from work, and then wait for the 3.45 train or walk it to Wakefield, which a great number did in the summer months. A train at about 2pm would be a great boon to the Featherstone public, and probably a financial success for the railway company.